We explore cognitive processes, exploring their significance and transformative potential. Our research group is passionate about understanding the multifaceted nature of metacognition and critical thinking. Through empirical studies and collaboration with educators and learners, we aim to generate evidence-based insights and practical recommendations for teachers and students to enhance metacognitive awareness and foster critical thinking skills.
Dr Rob Wass
Current and Potential Projects
Researchers
Publications
Dr Rob Wass is a Senior Lecturer in the Higher Education Development Centre at the University of Otago. He currently researches questions related to metacognition, critical thinking and the development of teachers’ pedagogical beliefs. Rob believes that metacognition is an important area of research as metacognition plays a pivotal role in fostering student achievement in higher education. By encouraging students to become aware of their learning strategies, strengths, and areas for improvement, metacognition empowers them to become self-directed learners. This heightened self-awareness enables students to set realistic goals, make informed decisions, and adapt their study techniques accordingly. Moreover, metacognitive skills promote deep understanding, critical thinking, and problem-solving abilities, enhancing overall academic performance.
I am drawn to metacognition because students’ ability to develop their metacognitive regulation and awareness is independent of their general intelligence. Moreover, students can be taught metacognitive skills, and once they have developed effective planning, monitoring, and evaluating skills, they are likely to perform better academically. I am hoping to find the most effective way of teaching students metacognition through our peer learning programmes, specifically through embedding metacognitive skills into PASS.
Metacognition is seldom taught in higher education, and many students lack metacognitive awareness and skills. Therefore, I would like to see staff provided with professional development on how to embed metacognition into their teaching.
Critical thinking is foundational to higher education but remains conceptually and pedagogically challenging. It has cognitive as well as cultural and political aspects.
My research has focused on the assessment of critical thinking, and on the ways in which higher education researchers provide justifications and rationales for their scholarship.
Critical thinking must remain a key focus of higher education. Students need to be taught how to think critically in their discipline, and develop their attitude towards and practice of thinking critically in all their edeavours.
Wass, R., Rogers, T., Kim Brown, Smith-Han, K., Tagg, J., Berg, D., & Gallagher, S. (2023). Pedagogical training for developing students’ metacognition: implications for educators. International Journal for Academic Development (accepted)
Investigating the effect of educators’ metacognitive professional development on students’ metacognitive awareness and regulation
Potential research questions related to metacognition in higher education might be:
1. How does metacognitive instruction impact students' learning outcomes?
2. How do students' metacognitive strategies vary across different subject domains and courses?
3. How does the use of technology, such as ChatGPT, affect students' metacognitive development?
4. How can higher education institutions support the development of metacognitive skills in students, both inside and outside of the classroom?
Potential research questions related to critical thinking in higher education might be:
1. How do digital tools such as ChatGPT facilitate or hinder the development of critical thinking in higher education settings?
2. How do cultural, societal, and linguistic backgrounds influence the development and expression of critical thinking skills?
3. How does peer learning influence the development of critical thinking skills?
4. How can staff be effectively trained to foster critical thinking skills in their students? What barriers exist for staff in this endeavour?
Natheeporn Keawkhong - How culture impacts teachers' conception of teaching for critical thinking in a Thai context?
Kexin Feng: The transitional experiences and perceptions of first-year international students from non-English speaking backgrounds in regard to academic motivation and performance: A case study at the University of Otago in New Zealand
Aimee Grange: How do successful first-generation Emirati students navigate home and study at university?
Potential research questions related to metacognition in higher education might be:
1. How does metacognitive instruction impact students' learning outcomes?
2. How do students' metacognitive strategies vary across different subject domains and courses?
3. How does the use of technology, such as ChatGPT, affect students' metacognitive development?
4. How can higher education institutions support the development of metacognitive skills in students, both inside and outside of the classroom?
Potential research questions related to critical thinking in higher education might be:
1. How do digital tools such as ChatGPT facilitate or hinder the development of critical thinking in higher education settings?
2. How do cultural, societal, and linguistic backgrounds influence the development and expression of critical thinking skills?
3. How does peer learning influence the development of critical thinking skills?
4. How can staff be effectively trained to foster critical thinking skills in their students? What barriers exist for staff in this endeavour?
Wass, R., Rogers, T., Brown, K., Smith-Han, K., Tagg, J., Berg, D., & Gallagher, S. (2023). Pedagogical training for developing students’ metacognition: implications for educators. International Journal for Academic Development, pp. 1-14. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2023.2246442
Smith-Han, K., Gallagher, S., Brown, K., Wass, R., Rogers, T., & Tagg, J. (2020). Professional development of educators in metacognition: A real ‘eye-opener’. Proceedings of the Australian & New Zealand Association for Health Professional Educators (ANZAHPE) Conference. (pp. 240). Retrieved from https://anzahpe.org
Wass, R., Harland, T., & Mercer, A. (2011). Scaffolding critical thinking in the zone of proximal development. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(3), 317-328. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2010.489237
Wass, R., & Golding, C. (2014). Sharpening a tool for teaching: the zone of proximal development. Teaching In Higher Education, 19(6), pp. 671-684. doi:10.1080/13562517.2014.901958
Input your search keywords and press Enter.